Ash Wednesday — 18 February 2015
Trinity, Iowa City – 12:15 pm & 7:00 pm
Joel 2:1-2,12-17 | Psalm 103 or 103:8-14 | 2 Corinthians 5:20b-6:10 | Matthew 6:1-6,16-21
Jesus said, “Beware of practicing your piety before others
in order to be seen by them; for then you have no reward from your Father in
heaven.”
In recent years there has been something of a new turn, at
least in our society, about the way people talk about their faith journeys. Part of this, I think, is related to the fact
that over my lifetime (which is now getting to be quite a while!) the place of
“church” in our society has shifted a bit.
It used to be taken for granted that most people were members of one or
another church, even though their participation may have been pretty minimal,
and even regular attendance was for many more a matter of social conformity
than any deep commitment. The fact that
there seems to be less of that going around these days is perhaps not a bad
thing, at least to the extent that it may represent a lessening of hypocrisy. And what an increasing number of people are
saying, according to studies by groups like the Pew Research
Center ’s Forum on
Religion and Public Life, is that they would describe themselves as “spiritual
but not religious.”
I’m not sure exactly what that means. Or rather, I suspect it may mean a number of different
things to different people who say that of themselves. (And probably still more different things to
people who, sometimes rather snottily, say that about other people.) Generally – very generally – it seems refer to
people who may well believe in God – in a variety of understandings of who or
what God is – and who may well pray, or meditate, or reflect on transcendent
reality, and have a strong moral sense – but who do not participate in or claim
affiliation with “organized religion.”
Maybe there are some of you who would say of yourselves
that you think of yourself as “spiritual but not religious,” in some sense or
other. Please be assured that it is not
my intent to beat up on you from the pulpit today. (Or any other day.)
On the contrary, I would like to suggest, on this first day
of the season of Lent in which we traditionally ramp up our attention to such
things as prayer and meditation, that Jesus himself might well be described as
“spiritual but not religious.” And in
that way, as in so many others, a model for us who claim and strive to follow
him.
Okay, what do I mean when I suggest that Jesus might be
described as “spiritual but not religious”?
Well, first of all, in this context, the word “spiritual,” and that
Jesus was “spiritual,” probably isn’t a matter for much argument, although I
think it has much deeper implications than is sometimes assumed. But “religious”? Jesus not “religious”? Well, of course it depends on what you mean
by “religious,” but, yes, I’ve been saying all my ministry that Jesus really
isn’t very “religious.” At least not in
the sense that we often mean by that word.
Now of course, I hope obviously, Jesus prayed. The gospels note this many times, and he gave
a model prayer to his disciples and to us, and we will be praying it (again) a
little later. The Gospel today suggests
that Jesus was in favor of fasting, at least in appropriate circumstances,
although he also says that while he, the bridegroom, is with his followers it
is not yet time to fast. And to the
extent that “fasting” has to do not just with self-denial but with self-sharing,
we can recall how when faced with five thousand hearers Jesus directed his
followers to share the food they had.
And although Jesus doesn’t seem to have had any money to give alms with,
he was a model of Peter’s later statement to the disabled man in the Temple , “Silver and gold
have I none, but what I have I give you” [Acts 3:6], as Jesus healed many of
their diseases and infirmities. Further,
it is clear in the Gospels that Jesus was a regular in the synagogues of Galilee , where he preached and taught. And healed, even on the Sabbath Day, which
was actually very irreligious of him!
And Jesus had a thorough knowledge of the Scriptures, which he often
quoted – and sometimes controverted. And
in the Temple Jesus was something of a troublemaker!
The unmistakably “religious” people in the Gospel
narratives are, after all, the scribes and Pharisees, as well as the Sadducees,
whose religiosity was well blended with power politics. We know what Jesus thought of their
“religion.” The Gospel today recounts
one of the instances of that. Not that
Jesus is against almsgiving, prayer, and fasting – the classic Lenten
disciplines. But they aren’t about being
“religious,” and certainly not about being seen as “religious.” But I think they are, or can be, about being
“spiritual.”
Jesus’ mission in this world was not about making us human
beings more “religious.” We were already
plenty religious, thank you very much.
Jesus came to proclaim, and to enact, the Reign of God in human life in
this world. Not just a promise about the
sweet by and by, about which Jesus says relatively little (although eternity is
the Kingdom’s horizon), but to enable us be what God in creation intended us to
be in the divine image and likeness.
And that, I think, is our vocation and destiny, a lifelong
task and goal to which we may pay special attention in Lent: to grow further into the fullness of
humanity, into the image of the God who is Love, the God of Justice, into the
vision of the God whose glory we are meant to be. [Cf. Irenaeus, Adv. Haer. IV.20.7.] Let us
go forward, then, in these coming weeks, not that we may be more “religious,”
whatever that means, but that by the grace of God’s Holy Spirit we may become
as human persons more loving, more just, more “spiritual” – more real.
No comments:
Post a Comment